|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 13546783
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: Marek2000
|
|
Marek, P., Griggs, R. A., & Koenig, C. S. (2000). Reducing cognitive complexity in a hypothetico-deductive reasoning task. Thinking & Reasoning, 6(3), p. p253–265.
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane 2007-12-12 13:22:25 Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane 2007-12-21 13:24:41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
The confusion/non-consequential thinking explanation proposed by Newstead, Girotto, and Legrenzi (1995) for poor performance on Wason's THOG problem (a hypothetico-deductive reasoning task) was examined in three experiments with 300 participants. In general, as the cognitive complexity of the problem and the possibility of non-consequential thinking were reduced, correct performance increased. Significant but weak facilitation (33-40% correct) was found in Experiment 1 for THOG classification instructions that did not include the indeterminate response option. Substantial facilitation (up to 75% correct) was obtained in Experiment 2 with O'Brien et al.'s (1990) one-other-THOG classification instruction. In Experiment 3, a revised version of O'Brien et al.'s pre-test problem format also led to substantial facilitation, even with the use of the standard three-choice THOG classification instruction. These findings are discussed in terms of Newstead et al.'s theoretical proposal and poss
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Informations supplémentaires en ligne :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
|
