|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 0022-0663
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: Verschaffel1992
|
|
Verschaffel, L., de Corte, E., & Pauwels, A. (1992). Solving compare problems: An eye movement test of lewis and mayer's consistency hypothesis. Journal of educational psychology, 84(1), p. p85–94.
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo 2007-12-11 12:12:00 Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane 2008-01-06 19:54:37
|
|
|
Catégories: Apprentissage mathématiques, COEFF, Full text
Descripteurs: 3rd graders & college students, COMPREHENSION, consistency of relational statement, Eye Movements, eye movements & comprehension during mathematical problem solving, MATHEMATICS, problem solving, test of A. Lewis & R. E. Mayer's consistency hypothesis, Text Structure, Theory Verification
Auteurs: de Corte, Pauwels, Verschaffel
Collection: Journal of educational psychology
|
Nombre de vues: 369
Popularité: 33.45%
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
According to A. Lewis and R. E. Mayer's (1987) simulation model for understanding compare problems, students make more comprehension errors when the order of the terms in the relational statement is not consistent with the preferred order. Three eye movement experiments, designed to test a number of hypotheses directly derived from this model, are discussed. The 1st experiment with university students solving 1-step compare problems revealed no evidence in favor of the model; the data of the 2nd experiment with 3rd graders, on the other hand, provided good support. To explain the results of the 1st experiment, a 3rd experiment was carried out in which university students were given a set of 2-step compare problems. The results from that study also fit with the model well, suggesting that the model holds true only when the task puts some cognitive demands on the S. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Informations supplémentaires en ligne :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
|
