Affichage de 1 - 20 of 28 (Bibliographie: Bibliographie WIKINDX globale)
Parameters:
|
|
Creator: Markman
|
|
|
Blok, S. V., Newman, G., & Rips, L. J. (2005). Individuals and their concepts. In W.-K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization Inside and Outside the Laboratory: Essays in Honor of Douglas L. Medin. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
|
Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Pop. 30.64%
|
|
|
Coley, J. D., Shafto, P., Stepanova, O., Baraff, E., Ahn, W.-K., & Goldstone, R. L., et al. (2005). Knowledge and category-based induction. In Categorization Inside and Outside the Laboratory: Essays in Honor of Douglas L. Medin. (pp. p69–85). American Psychological Association.
|
Dernièrement modifiée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 33.18%
|
|
|
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., Markman, A. B., & Ferguson, R. W. (1998). Analogy just looks like high-level perception: why a domain-general approach to analogical mapping is right. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 10(2), pp. 231–257.
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 21.94%
|
|
|
Gentner, D., & Wolff, P. Metaphor and knowledge change. In E. Dietrich & A. B. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines (pp. 295–342). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 25.2%
|
|
|
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1995). Analogy-based reasoning in connectionism. In M. Arbib (Ed.), The handbook of brain theory and neural networks (pp. 91–93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 25.2%
|
|
|
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1995). Similarity is like analogy: structural alignment in comparison. In C. Cacciari (Ed.), Similarity in language, thought and perception (pp. 111–147). Brussels: BREPOLS.
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 26.11%
|
|
|
Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., Markman, A. B., & Kotovsky, L. (1995). Two forces in the development of relational similarity. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 263–313). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 28.47%
|
|
|
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), pp. 45–56.
|
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Pop. 22.94%
|
|
|
Gentner, D., Brem, S. K., Ferguson, R. W., Markman, A. B., Levidow, B. B., Wolff, P., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogical reasoning and conceptual change: a case study of johannes kepler. The journal of the learning sciences, 6(1), pp. 3–40.
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 25.48%
|
|
|
Gentner, D., Brem, S. K., Ferguson, R. W., Wolff, P., Markman, A. B., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogy and creativity in the works of johannes kepler. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 403–459). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 27.47%
|
|
|
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (2005). Defining structural similarity. Journal of cognitive science, 6, pp. 1–20.
|
Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Pop. 23.03%
|
|
|
Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. J. (2005). Relational categories. In W.-K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the lab (pp. 151–175).
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 29.74%
|
|
|
Goldstone, R. L., Steyvers, M., Spencer-Smith, J., & Kersten, A. (2000). Interactions between perceptual and conceptual learning. In E. Dietrich & A. B. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines. (pp. 191–228). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
|
Dernièrement modifiée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 28.83%
|
|
|
Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2000). The proper treatment of symbols in a connectionist architecture. In E. Dietrich & A. B. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines. (pp. 229–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
Dernièrement modifiée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 28.47%
|
|
|
Hummel, J. E. (2000). Where view-based theories break down: The role of structure in human shape perception and object recognition. In E. Dietrich & A. B. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines. (pp. 157–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
Dernièrement modifiée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 28.29%
|
|
|
Love, B. C., & Markman, A. B. (2003). The nonindependence of stimulus properties in human category learning. Memory & Cognition, 31(5), p. p790–799.
|
Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Pop. 31.73%
|
|
|
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. cognitive psychology, 25(4), p. p431.
|
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Pop. 28.56%
|
|
|
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(4), p. p517–535.
|
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Pop. 28.83%
|
|
|
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1996). Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons. Memory and Cognition, 24(2), pp. 235–249.
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 22.48%
|
|
|
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1997). The effects of alignability on memory storage. Psychological Science, 8(5), pp. 363–367.
|
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Pop. 22.21%
|
|
|
