|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: Gentner2001a
|
|
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor & Symbol, 16(3&4), pp. 223–247.
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo 2008-01-22 11:19:10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
There are 2 basic controversies concerning how metaphors are processed. First, are
metaphoric mappings more akin to literal comparisons or to literal categorizations?
And second, is metaphor comprehension indirect or direct? We believe that these controversies
are more appqent than real and that a unified theoretical framework can be
offered that reconciles these opposing views. The central idea is that all metaphors involve
structural alignment of the target and base domains. Whether these alignments
are more akin to comparisons or to categorizations, and whether they are computed
directly or indirectly, depends on 2 factors: the type of representation invoked by the
base term and the linguistic form of the metaphor.
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
|
