|
|
|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 0278-7393
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: Cummins1992
|
|
Cummins, D. D. (1992). Role of analogical reasoning in the induction of problem categories'. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 5, pp. 1103–1124.
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo 2008-01-16 14:20:24 Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane 2008-01-16 22:11:04
|
|
|
Catégories: Analogie, Catégorisation, COEFF, Raisonnement
Descripteurs: Analogy, Classification (Cognitive Process), college & graduate students, erratum, individual problem structure analysis vs analogical problem comparison processing, induction of problem categories, Inductive Deductive Reasoning, REASONING
Auteurs: Cummins
Collection: Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|
Nombre de vues: 396
Popularité: 35.9%
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
In 3 experiments, novices were required to answer questions while reading a series of problems. The questions required them either to analyze individual problem structures (intraproblem processing) or compare problem structures (analogical comparison processing) to derive answers. Ss who engaged in problem comparison processing were found to categorize and describe problems on the basis of problem structure, whereas those who engaged in intraproblem processing, or simply read the problems, categorized and described them on the basis of surface features. Analogical comparisons also facilitated selection and construction of equations relative to intraproblem processing. These results suggest that analogical comparison is an important component in the induction of problem categories. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved)
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Informations supplémentaires en ligne :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
