|
|
|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 0272-4987
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: Politzer1992
|
|
Politzer, G., & Nguyen-Xuan, A. (1992). Reasoning about conditional promises and warnings: Darwinian algorithms, mental models, relevance judgements or pragmatic schemas? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 44(3), p. p401–421.
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane 2008-01-11 10:58:10 Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane 2008-01-24 09:36:44
|
|
|
Catégories: Full text, Raisonnement, Raisonnement déductif
Descripteurs: 15-18 yr olds & college students, control of reasoning about conditional promises vs warnings by combined obligation & permission schema, FRANCE, point of view, REASONING, Roles, schema, Social Interaction
Auteurs: Nguyen-Xuan, Politzer
Collection: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology
|
Nombre de vues: 360
Popularité: 32.7%
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
Investigated whether reasoning about social contracts, such as conditional promises and warnings, is controlled by a schema made of 2 pragmatic schemas expressing an obligation and a permission posited by P. Cheng and K. J. Holyoak (see record 1986-08193-001). Ss were 150 15-18 yr old Parisian secondary students in Exp 1 and 220 undergraduates in Exp 2. Materials were thematic versions of the Wason selection task (B. Foss, 1966) in which the rule and the core of a scenario were kept constant and the point of view of the actor as promisor or promisee was varied. Results show the occurrence of a correct, 4-choice pattern of response and falsify predictions derived from L. Cosmides's (see record 1989-39894-001) theory of social exchange. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved)
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Informations supplémentaires en ligne :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
|
