|
|
|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 13546783
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: Krawczyk2004
|
|
Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2004). Structural constraints and object similarity in analogical mapping and inference. Thinking & Reasoning, 10(1), p. p85–104.
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane 2007-12-12 15:05:14 Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane 2007-12-21 13:23:23
|
|
|
Catégories: Analogie, Effets de contenu, Full text, Transfert analogique
Descripteurs: Analogy, INFERENCE, KNOWLEDGE, REASON, REASONING, Theory of, THOUGHT & thinking
Auteurs: Holyoak, Hummel, Krawczyk
Collection: Thinking & Reasoning
|
Nombre de vues: 330
Popularité: 29.97%
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
Theories of analogical reasoning have viewed relational structure as the dominant determinant of analogical mapping and inference, while assigning lesser importance to similarity between individual objects. An experiment is reported in which these two sources of constraints on analogy are placed in competition under conditions of high relational complexity. Results demonstrate equal importance for relational structure and object similarity, both in analogical mapping and in inference generation. The human data were successfully simulated using a computational analogy model (LISA) that treats both relational correspondences and object similarity as soft constraints that operate within a limited-capacity working memory; but not with a model (SME) that treats relational structure as pre-eminent. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR Copyright of Thinking & Reasoning is the property of Psychology Press (UK) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Informations supplémentaires en ligne :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
|
