|
|
|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 02724987
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: Newstead2004
|
|
Newstead, S. E., Handley, S. J., Harley, C., Wright, H., & Farrelly, D. (2004). Individual differences in deductive reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 57(1), p. p33–60.
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane 2007-12-12 12:51:11 Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane 2007-12-21 13:27:36
|
|
|
Catégories: Full text, Raisonnement, Raisonnement déductif
Descripteurs: Experimental, INDIVIDUAL differences, INTELLECT, LOGIC, PSYCHOLOGY, REASONING (Psychology), THOUGHT & thinking
Auteurs: Farrelly, Handley, Harley, Newstead, Wright
Collection: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A
|
Nombre de vues: 357
Popularité: 32.43%
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
Three studies are reported, which examined individual differences in deductive reasoning as a function of intellectual ability and thinking style. Intellectual ability was a good predictor of logical performance on syllogisms, especially where there was a conflict between logic and believability. However, in the first two experiments there was no link between ability and performance on indicative selection tasks, in sharp contrast to previous research. This correlation did, however, return in the final study. Our data are consistent with the claim that the correlation with logical accuracy on abstract selection tasks is found primarily with participants of relatively high ability. At lower levels, pragmatically cued responses are given but those of slightly higher ability divorce the rule from the scenario and respond consistently (though incorrectly) across problems. Self-report questionnaires were generally poor predictors of performance, but a measure of the ability to generate al
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Informations supplémentaires en ligne :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
|
