|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 10508406
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: Kurtz2001
|
|
Kurtz, K. J., Miao, C.-H., & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(4), p. p417–446.
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo 2007-12-11 16:47:50 Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane 2008-01-06 19:24:49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
Analogies are typically drawn from a well-understood situation to a situation that is poorly understood. In this research, we investigate a different route to analogical insight. We suggest that mutual alignment—that is, comparison between 2 partially understood situations—can act to promote comprehension and abstraction. We presented participants with 2 analogous scenarios depicting heat flow. They were given processing tasks that varied in the degree to which comparison was required. We then measured insight into the common structure in 3 ways. Participants were asked to (a) specify differences between the 2 pictured scenarios, (b) write scenario descriptions, and (c) rate the similarity of the 2 scenarios. The results show that carrying out comparison promotes greater insight into the common causal structure, but only when the comparison is intensive. The best results were obtained when participants were asked to jointly interpret the scenarios and to list specific correspondences
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Informations supplémentaires en ligne :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
|
