référence suivante
Article de revue: Clé de citation BibTeX:  Gentner2006
Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. J. (2006). Relations, objects, and the composition of analogies. Cognitive science, 30, pp. 609–642.
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane 2007-12-07 15:51:07    Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane 2008-01-06 19:19:59
 B  
Catégories: Analogie, COEFF, Full text
Auteurs: Gentner, Kurtz
Collection: Cognitive science

Nombre de vues:  252
Popularité:  22.89%

 
Résumé
This research addresses the kinds of matching elements that determine analogical relatedness and literal
similarity. Despite theoretical agreement on the importance of relational match, the empirical evidence
is neither systematic nor definitive. In 3 studies, participants performed online evaluations of relatedness
of sentence pairs that varied in either the object or relational match. Results show a consistent
focus on relational matches as the main determinant of analogical acceptance. In addition, analogy does
not require strict overall identity of relational concepts. Semantically overlapping but nonsynonymous
relations were commonly accepted, but required more processing time. Finally, performance in a similarity
rating task partly paralleled analogical acceptance; however, relatively more weight was given to
object matches. Implications for psychological theories of analogy and similarity are addressed.
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane    Dernièrement modifiée par: Lynda Taabane

 
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
 

 
wikindx  v3.8.2 ©2007     |     Total Resources:  1609     |     Database queries:  29     |     Script execution:  1.38046 secs