|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 0013-1954
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: VanDooren2004
|
|
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Weyers, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). The predictive power of intuitive rules: A critical analysis of the impact of "more a--more b" and "same a--same b". Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2-3), p. p179.
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane 2008-02-15 13:18:33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
In the international community of mathematics and science educators the intuitive rules theory developed by the Israeli researchers Tirosh and Stavy receives much attention. According to this theory, students' responses to a variety of mathematical and scientific tasks can be explained in terms of their application of some common intuitive rules. Two major intuitive rules are manifested in comparison tasks: "More A--more B" and "Same A--same B". In this paper, we address two important questions for which the existing literature on intuitive rules does not provide a convincing research-based answer: (1) are the reasoning processes of students who respond in line with a given intuitive rule actually affected by that rule or by essentially other misconceptions (leading to the same answer), and (2) are individual students consistent in their choice of one of the intuitive rules when confronted with different, conceptually unrelated tasks? A test consisting of five comparison problems from
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
Informations supplémentaires en ligne :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Lynda Taabane
|
|
|
