|
|
|
|
|
Article de revue:
|
ID no. (ISBN etc.): 0278-7393
|
Clé de citation BibTeX: Landy2007a
|
|
Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), pp. 720–733.
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo 2008-02-11 11:50:24
|
|
|
Catégories: Apprentissage mathématiques, Full text, Raisonnement
Descripteurs: COGNITION, embodied cognition, Judgment, MATHEMATICS, perceptual grouping, REASONING, relational reasoning, rule based syntactic judgments, symbolic processing, Symbolism
Auteurs: Goldstone, Landy
Collection: Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|
Nombre de vues: 379
Popularité: 34.42%
|
|
|
|
|
Résumé
In 4 experiments, the authors explored the role of visual layout in rule-based syntactic judgments. Participants judged the validity of a set of algebraic equations that tested their ability to apply the order of operations. In each experiment, a nonmathematical grouping pressure was manipulated to support or interfere with the mathematical convention. Despite the formal irrelevance of these grouping manipulations, accuracy in all experiments was highest when the nonmathematical pressure supported the mathematical grouping. The increase was significantly greater when the correct judgment depended on the order of operator precedence. The result that visual perception impacts rule application in mathematics has broad implications for relational reasoning in general. The authors conclude that formally symbolic reasoning is more visual than is usually proposed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved)(from the journal abstract)
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
Informations supplémentaires en ligne :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idées
pdf dispo
Ajoutée par: Sterenn Audo
|
|
|
